Consequently, the Histories were not considered central to the humanist canon. In addition to studying the customs (nomoi) of various people, Herodotus is also interested in natural and divine phenomena (floods, for example). He often refers back and forth to “the Assyrian logos” or “the Libyan logos,” etc. This is where my major rub lies with many attitudes towards him. Herodotus (/hɪˈrɒdətəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἡρόδοτος, Hêródotos, Attic Greek pronunciation: [hɛː.ró.do.tos]) was a Greek historian who was born in Halicarnassus in the Persian Empire (modern-day Bodrum, Turkey) and lived in the fifth century BC (c. 484 – c. 425 BC), a contemporary of … Herodotus was born in Halicarnassus a Greek city in southwest Asia Minor and lived in the 5th Century. The first great work of literary prose to be written outside of the Biblical tradition, the Histories is not only the forerunner of all discursive writing in the Western canon, but it is also the most complete surviving document of Pre-Socratic thought, the writings of the other Pre-Socratic thinkers being fragmentary. Herodotus covers the empire’s geography, social structure, and history before describing the events which led to Xerxes’ invasion of Greece and the Greek city-states uniting to defeat his army. Current scholarship generally schematizes the Histories as containing twenty-eight main logoi. about Greek history originates from writers. This brief account of the first half of Herodotus’s History not only conceals its infinite variety but is positively misleading insofar as it suggests a straightforward geographical, sociological, and historical description of a varied empire. The primary narrative arc traces eighty years. It is probable, however, that Herodotus did intend to end with the events of 479. Thucydides is reporting on war, and war alone. Herodotus is known as the “Father of History” for writing the first great narrative of history, which documented the events and wars between Greece and Persia in the 5th century BCE. charming writing style. The Histories were considered complete in antiquity; Thucydides starts off close to where Herodotus himself ended. Herodotus’ emphasis on evidence and autopsy is shared with the early medical writers of the Hippocratic corpus, for example. Similarly, in his political summaries he is commonly content with explaining events on the basis of trivial personal motives, yet there again he understood certain essentials: that the political meaning of the struggle between the great territorial empire of Persia and the small Greek states was not one of Greek independence only but the rule of law as the Greeks understood it; and that the political importance of the Battle of Marathon for the Greek world was that it foreshadowed the rise of Athens (confirmed by Salamis) to a position of equality and rivalry with Sparta and the end of the long-accepted primacy of the latter. Herodotus’ Historiesfamously begins with the following sentence: “I, Herodotus of Halicarnassus, am here setting forth my history, that time may not draw the color from what man has brought into being, nor those great and wonderful deeds, manifested by both Greeks and barbarians, fail of their report, and, together with all this, the reason why they fought each other.” This sentence is programmatic for the work as a whole, which can be divided roughly into two major parts—an account of the wonders and peoples … The story of Croesus in Book I gives Herodotus the occasion to foreshadow, as it were, in Croesus’s talk with Solon the general meaning of the story of the Greco-Persian Wars, and so of his whole History—that great prosperity is “a slippery thing” and may lead to a fall, more particularly if it is accompanied by arrogance and folly as it was in Xerxes. Be on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox. Herodotus’s History is an account of the Greco-Persian Wars (499–479 BCE) and the story of the growth and organization of the Persian empire. Herodotus was indeed popular during the Hellenistic period, but he was popular because every two-bit intellectual went abroad with the intent of writing a pamphlet disproving some facet of the History.<92> The only one of these pamphlets that has survived with the text intact is Plutarch's On the Malignity of Herodotus. Making InferencesWhy do you think Herodotus would call his work “researches” or “inquiries”? The overall impression is that of a careful and credible reporter, as well as someone who has an abiding curiosity about the world. Not necessarily, but it is a fair thesis to entertain. Nonetheless, in Poetics 9, Herodotus is Aristotle's example of “historical” writing. Homeric qualities can indeed be found in major elements of Herodotus’ writing, including the introductory proem. Herodotus was a Greek Historian from Ionia. This use of digressions to break up a long narrative is one of the many debts that Herodotus owes to Homer. The Greek word that forms its title, historiai, from which our word “history” derives, means inquiries—and so a more accurate title might be the Inquiries of Herodotus of Halicarnassus. Custom may be king, but there may nevertheless be natural limits or natural currents running through the customs of various peoples, for human nature may not be infinitely plastic. To Herodotus, the old moral “pride comes before a fall” was a matter of common observation and had been proved true by the greatest historical event of his time. Herodotus presents his analytical method openly and candidly. "That sounds obvious to us now, but it wasn't at all obvious when Herodotus was writing in the 440s B.C.E.," says Dewald. Herodotus’ veracity or accuracy is perhaps the most disputed aspect of his writing. If Herodotus owes a debt to Homer and the poets, he also clearly owes one to the fifth-century tradition of Ionian science. Writers like Homer, Thucydides, Plato, Herodotus and more had their own writing style. Herodotus Style of Writing 1. Alternatively, Herodotus’ real interest may not be in accuracy, per se, but rather in using different stories to interrogate human nature. Birthplace: Bodrum, Turkey Location of death: Bodrum, Turkey Cause of death: unspecified. Herodotus "invented" history as we know it, Dewald says, because he was the first to see these myriad stories from the past as small parts of one much bigger story — the story of the known human world. ”[10] This shows how the style of writing by Herodotus is written through the belief of telling of the future and predictions which makes it not an accurate source of history. The important question is what Herodotus was trying to achieve through his display of authority and accuracy. Explain. Herodotus is one of the first Western thinkers to consider deeply and comprehensively the wide range of human experience for good or ill, as well as the relationship between human beings to the divine. Kenton L. Sparks writes, "In antiquity, Herodotus had acquired the reputation of being unreliable, biased, parsimonious in his praise of heroes, and mendacious". This fundamentally rationalistic approach was an epochal innovation in Western historiography. More important than individual precursors, however, was the intellectual milieu of the fifth century. Seth Benardete, Herodotean Inquires, South Bend: 2008. As already mentioned, he sometimes reports what people say because it reveals what they actually think and not because he is somehow credulous. Some have claimed that this is the Herodotean vision of human life itself, that happiness must be looked for only at the end of life, because fortune, fate, or the divine can always intervene to bring the ostensibly happy man to sadness and ruin. All of this, and much besides, some of it only included because of Herodotus’s personal interest, helps to explain the positions of these Greek states in 490, the year of the Battle of Marathon, and in 480, the year in which Xerxes invaded Greece. Questions 1. He distinguishes between autopsy—“seeing for oneself,” or first-hand knowledge—and akoe—oral testimony, or things “heard by report.” He manifestly prefers the first to the second, although he accepts, and interrogates, the latter when he has no personal knowledge of a particular issue. Herodotus (; Ἡρόδοτος, Hēródotos, ; BC) was an Classical Greece historian who was born in Halicarnassus in the Persian Empire (modern-day Bodrum, Turkey).He is known for having written the book The Histories (Greek language: Ἱστορίαι Historíai), a detailed record of his "inquiry" (ἱστορία historía) on the origins of the Greco-Persian Wars. 2. Yet he understood at least one essential of the strategy of Xerxes’ invasion, the Persians’ dependence on their fleet though they came by land, and therefore Herodotus understood the decisive importance of the naval battle at Salamis. In various places, Herodotus offers differing accounts of the same event, but he also says at one place, “My duty is to report what is said, but it is not my duty to believe it all alike. Moreover, external sources reveal some startling inaccuracies in the Histories. The Iliad and Odyssey are similarly full of excursuses; the description of the shield of Achilles is perhaps the most famous. Herodotus believes in divine retribution as a punishment of human impiety, arrogance, and cruelty, but his emphasis is always on human actions and character rather than on the interventions of the gods, in his descriptions of historical events. Herodotus’ debt to Homer is clear, but he is clearly more “scientific” than Homer in his examination of causes and grievances, if perhaps less so than his successor, Thucydides. Athens’s complex political development in the 6th century bce is touched upon, as is the conservative character of the Spartans. These are not, however, the only digressions in the work. These logoi were possibly originally intended as independent monographs or perhaps as performance pieces—there is substantial (reported) evidence that Herodotus gave oral recitations during his travels in Greece—which might explain the tenuous links between them and the main narrative. Herodotus. Although Herodotus’ stories may be false in certain particulars, however, they may also reveal the horizon of the peoples that he was studying, and so accurately record the internal view of their beliefs. These divisions, and the ascription of each book to one of the nine muses, can be attributed to the librarians of Alexandria and is first attested in the first century BCE. May this rule govern my entire work” (VII 152, 3). Also, he is more holistic; concerned with nature, culture, speech, art, with the cornucopia of the human condition. This he achieved by means of digressions skillfully worked into his main narrative. Homer and Hesiod, on the other hand, both composed verse. Since the latter half of the twentieth century, many Western scholars have questioned the veracity of Herodotus’s historical record from the angle of writing style, narrative model, the use of sources, and purpose of writing. And his combative rhetorical style is reminiscent of the Sophists. It begins with Cyrus’ (and Croesus’) rise to power. The story of Xerxes’ invasion of Greece is a clear illustration of the moral viewpoint here; a war that by all human reasoning should have been won was irretrievably lost. Indeed, some of the dialogues that Herodotus presents—for instance the famous discussion of the nature of the regime between Darius and his fellow conspirators (III 80–3)—remind one of the set piece rhetorical debates for which the Sophists were famous. Herodotus was considered a historian, but he wrote a lot of mythology. The accuracy of the works of Herodotus has been controversial since his own era. He makes no invocation to the muse, moreover, which suggests the power of purely human thought and inquiry. More prosaically, six out of the seven names he gives for Darius’ conspirators are confirmed by Darius’ inscription at Bisutun, suggesting a reliable Persian informant (III 7, 1–3), and even one of his most outré accounts, that of the ants who dig for gold (III 102, 5), has been rescued by recent scientific speculations (that suggest the ants may, in fact, have been marmots). The reasons for these divisions are not entirely clear—the books are not all the same length, and so cannot correspond to the length of a scroll (as was common in antiquity)—and, moreover, these divisions themselves would often seem to break up the material arbitrarily. In the earlier portions of the work, the historical (or mythical) account is interspersed with descriptions of the customs and beliefs of various peoples, including the Persians, the Greeks, the Scythians, the Egyptians, and others, focusing particularly on their distinctive piety and its relationship to politics and war. Herodotus was a great traveler with an eye for detail, a good geographer, a man with an indefatigable interest in the customs and past history of his fellow citizens, and a man of the widest tolerance, with no bias for the Greeks and against the barbarians. Another possibility, however, is that Herodotus intends his readers to think through these connections. Herodotus’ interest in Greeks and barbarians may even reflect a desire to shed light on the unexamined assumptions of Greekness itself, since his initial readership would naturally be Greek. Quick guides for ... Herodotus' Histories is divided into nine Books and each of these Books is divided into Chapters and each chapter into line numbers.The purpose of such a system The History’s structure is more complex than that, and so is the author’s method of narration. He was not writing for modern historians as an audience, or with the intention of doing the same things as modern history. The proliferation of digressions, whether of one sentence or even of a whole book—the Egyptian logos, for example, takes up the entirety of Book Two—is typical of Herodotus’ writing and gives the Histories their characteristic winding, story-telling quality, captured in particular in the translation of David Grene (1987), from which this introduction quotes. Herodotus differs markedly in his style from either Homer or Hesiod. An even more basic debt to Homer is his choice of subject matter. There is a clear overlap between these two parts of the Histories: the wonders and peoples that Herodotus describes are those encountered by the expanding Persian empire, an expansionism that ultimately led to the Persian Wars. Plutarch’s view was that it was a rhetorical strategy, used to gain unjustified credibility for, essentially, mendacious testimony. Homer’s theme of war between Greeks and barbarians is the direct precursor of Herodotus’ discussion, and signaled in the Histories by the work’s opening discussion of the retaliatory “abduction of women” between Greece and Asia, including of course Helen of Troy, over whom the Trojan War was (allegedly) fought. Modern editions of Herodotus follow the medieval manuscript tradition in dividing the Histories into nine books. Herodotus, however, unlike Homer, writes in prose, not poetry. Cyrus was the first Achaemenid king and founder of the Persian empire, while Croesus was the Lydian king whose march against Cyrus, according to Herodotus, caused the Achaemenids to turn their attention to Ionia and to the Greek mainland. © 2020 The Foundation for Constitutional Government Inc. All rights reserved. Good luck! Although their works survive largely in fragments or précis—and none had Herodotus’ integrated scope—a number of writers were likely precursors to Herodotus, perhaps most notably Hellanicus of Lesbos, who wrote some thirty monographs on ethnography and other topics. Perhaps the most famous example comes when he recounts the report of Phoenicians who circumnavigated Africa and noted that at a certain point the sun started to appear on the right (IV, 42, 4). Indeed, Herodotus’ focus is not so much on difference as on the common human nature that generates so many interesting variations, and which can be explored thoroughly only through its many manifestations. The historian Duris of Samos called Herodotus a "myth-monger". Herodotus announced the purpose and scope of his work at the beginning of his Histories: The two themes, however, do not always appear to be integrated, which is sometimes considered a reason to think our text is not in the final form intended by Herodotus. The biggest effect of the difference amongst the two historian’s style of writing is the fact that Einhard’s history of Charlemagne’s life gives information that makes it seem as if the events were realistic, while some of the events that Herodotus talks about seem conjured. One of Herodotus’ preoccupations is the character of happiness and good (or bad) fortune, whether of individuals or of cities. Structured around the first four Achaemenid kings—Cyrus, Cambyses, Darius, and Xerxes— and their military campaigns against various peoples, the Histories contains a multitude of ethnographic digressions, which make up many of the most striking and memorable parts of the text. Herodotus, in other words, may be scrutinizing and comparing the various accounts articulated by various peoples. It is that quality that makes the first half of his work not only so readable but of such historical importance. THINKERS. Herodotus’ Histories famously begins with the following sentence: “I, Herodotus of Halicarnassus, am here setting forth my history, that time may not draw the color from what man has brought into being, nor those great and wonderful deeds, manifested by both Greeks and barbarians, fail of their report, and, together with all this, the reason why they fought each other.”. You simply need to write in the same way he does. The History was divided into 13 separate books by later scholars, but is now, in its … Herodotus to me reads something like a prose epic with lots of drawn out similes and metaphors and vocabulary that could be drawn from the Iliad or Odyssey. Tacitus’ style of history writing more closely resembles the ideal of what a historian should be, in quality, accuracy and freedom of personal idealism or slant. He thus describes the actions of Croesus, the king of Lydia, who conquered the Greeks of mainland Ionia but who was in turn subjugated by the Persians, and this account leads Herodotus into a digression on the past history of the Ionians and Dorians and the division between the two most powerful Greek cities, the Ionian Athens and the Doric Sparta. “This is the bitterest pain among men,” Herodotus writes in one of his final thoughts, “to have much knowledge but no power” (IX 16, 10). As Herodotus (Ἡρόδοτος) was the founder of historical writing, references to written or archival records in his Histories (The History) are of particular interest. 3. HERODOTUS (c. 484-425 B.C. Modern editions of Herodotus follow the medieval manuscript tradition in dividing the, GREAT The most common style in use in the field of Classical Studies is the author-date style, also known as Chicago 2, but MLA is also quite common and perfectly acceptable. He was neither naive nor easily credulous. Herodotus wrote only one book, known today as the Histories. It concludes with the battle of Mycale, which, along with the battle of Plataea, ended the second Persian invasion of Greece, with the Greeks victorious. For example, Herodotus had no need to explain Greek geography, customs, or political systems to his Greek readers, but he did wish to describe the political situation at the relevant times of the many Greek cities later involved in the war. It is also important to note that there is sometimes little correlation between the length of digressions on particular countries and the importance of those countries in the Persian Wars. Homer’s famous epics are the Iliad and the Odyssey, an experience of godlike warriors fighting during the Trojan War and a treacherous journey back home. My mom says that I only went to kindergarten in the afternoon session because at that time it was only necessary to go for half a day of kindergarten. The differences between Herodotus and Thucydides are in style, interpretation and purpose. Writing in prose, Herodotus conveys facts without artistic elaboration. Herodotus was born circa 484 BC into a sophisticated family in the Persian-loyal city-state of Halicarnassus (modern Bodrum, Turkey On the other hand, Herodotus is at times astonishingly accurate. Herodotus' other famous nickname is 'the father of lies'. At times, he even tells the reader that he was unable to obtain certain information, and he occasionally presents and adjudicates between various sources and accounts. His comparative project may therefore have a non-parochial intention: to liberate the Greeks themselves (or certain of his Greek readers, at least) from the shackles of unreflective custom. One question is then the source of good fortune. Greek historian. The best way to find Herodotus' style is to look at his works. Seen in this light, the perplexities would represent not inconsistencies but rather stimuli to the education of the attentive reader. In the second half he is largely, but by no means only, writing military history, and it is evident that he knew little of military matters. Greek historian, called the Father of History, was born at Halicarnassus in Asia Minor, then dependent upon the Persians, in or about the year 484 BC. Thucydides (c. 460/455 - 399/398 BCE) was an Athenian general who wrote the contemporary History of the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, which lasted from 431 BCE to 404 BCE.However, Thucydides' History was never finished, and as such, ends mid-sentence in the winter of 411 BCE. Histories were written largely for popular consumption, and they were not often intended as scholarly works, but as a preservation of popular myths at the time of the writing. For Herodotus’ unremitting focus on the mythological or wondrous, Thucydides roundly criticizes him. Gender: Male Religion: Pagan Race or Ethnicity. The Histories are as much driven by ethnographic inquiry as they are by what we would typically call “history.” The thorny question of the relationship between these inquiries and the Persian Wars is a puzzle that the work raises but does not explicitly answer. Herodotus believes in divine retribution as a punishment of human impiety, arrogance, and cruelty, but his emphasis is always on human actions and character rather than on the interventions of the gods, in his descriptions of historical events. The literary models used in this book include selections from Herodotus’ Histories , the Greek myths, Athanasius’ On the Incarnation of the Word of God , Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People , and Aeschylus’ trilogy The Oresteia , just to mention a few. The Histories ends abruptly with Cyrus the Great’s comment that “soft lands breed soft men” and the subsequent Persian decision to continue to live and rule from the mountains. In that discussion, Solon famously warns: “Call no man happy until he is dead, until then he is not happy, he is merely lucky” (I 29–32). In this regard he inserts not only amusing short stories but also dialogue and even speeches by the leading historical figures into his narrative, thus beginning a practice that would persist throughout the course of historiography in the classical world. For Herodotus, then, the most important thing is not necessarily to corroborate reports but, instead, to present different points of view. Poems, especially those written in the epic style, such as theirs, relied heavily on oral tradition. For example, Herodotus mistakenly says the pass at Thermopylae runs north to south (VII 176, 3), while his account of Upper Egypt in Book II is so notorious for its many errors that some question whether he travelled to Egypt at all. In Herodotus’ so-called Lydian logos, the Athenian Solon (one of seven wise men of ancient Greece) offers a rumination on fortune, happiness, and the god to the wealthy Lydian king Croesus. Although this maxim of geographical determinism is not an inappropriate ending to Herodotus’ ethnographic observations, it is sometimes believed that the work remains unfinished. Although the thread may sometimes be hard to follow through the wealth of details and anecdotes, the fundamental narrative of the conflict between the Greeks and the barbarians is consistently maintained and suggests an overarching authorial intention. When I was in kindergarten my favorite thing to do was play on the playground and nap. Herodotus' style was largely typical of Grecian-Roman historiography: that is, an emphasis on the sensational, the mythical, and a downplay on verifiable facts. Herodotus was thus born a Persian subject, and such he con~ tinued until he was thirty or fiveandthirty years of age. Herodotus himself comments: “Some may believe this, but I do not.” Modern exploration has, of course, confirmed that this is indeed the case in the southern hemisphere. You could describe an event in history, or something in your life. The main narrative ends in the previous chapter with the phrase “and nothing else happened that year” (IX, 121), leaving this short passage tacked on. Overall, the Histories narrates the events culminating in the great Persian Wars between the city-states of Greece and the empire of Achaemenid Persia. 1. Whether this is the Herodotean view of happiness (or not) is a much-debated question, but the work is manifestly full of stories of hubris followed by reversal. It is generally believed that the histories were first intended to be orated by the author himself in the same manner as a recitation of Homer. The styles of writing differ through the fact that Einhard gives what seems to be accurate details, while Herodotus gives information through other people and personal beliefs. Analyzing MotivesIf Herodotus was a Greek, was it possible for him to be completely objec-tive in his history? He set a precedent in his style of writing, and his work is still a valuable source of information from that period. By the mid-fifth century BCE writing in Greece had existed for only about 300 years. Essays and criticism on Herodotus - Critical Essays. One important and, indeed, remarkable feature of Herodotus’s History is his love of and gift for narrating history in the storyteller’s manner (which is not unlike Homer’s). If Herodotus suggests that “everywhere custom (nomoi) is king” (III, 38), does that make him a cultural relativist in the common sense of that term? Of course, this leads to the question of whether the reversal is a divine response to transgression, the natural result of purely human overreaching, or, indeed, purely chance. Students who complete Herodotus will have received writing instruction which is at least on par with a standard K-12 writing scope and sequence. Cicero calls Herodotus the “father of history,” but Plutarch calls him “the father of lies.” Thucydides’ inveighing against those who “write display pieces for immediate hearing” would also seem to have been directed against Herodotus. Early in the Histories, he writes: “For of those (cities) that were great in earlier times most have now become small, and those that were great in my time were small in the time before [for] …man’s good fortune never abides in the place” (I 5, 4). , unlike Homer, writes in prose, not poetry with Cyrus (. Con~ tinued until he was thirty or fiveandthirty years of age, and his rhetorical. Introductory proem instruction which is at times astonishingly accurate especially those written in the 5th century, with the of... Plato, Herodotus conveys facts without artistic elaboration Herodotus, in Poetics 9, Herodotus is at astonishingly! Thucydides is reporting on war, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica he does logos, ”.! ” ( VII 152, 3 ) accounts articulated by various peoples complete in ;. Of the fifth century if Herodotus owes a debt to Homer and Hesiod, on lookout. Delivered right to your inbox be on the mythological or wondrous, Thucydides, Plato, is., interpretation and purpose the early medical writers of the many debts Herodotus... Reporter, as is the conservative character of happiness and good ( or bad ) fortune whether... The various accounts articulated by various peoples and inquiry, and war alone manuscript in... Race or Ethnicity you are agreeing to news, offers, and so is the character... Other words, may be scrutinizing and comparing the various accounts articulated by various peoples various peoples quality that the. Of age the overall impression is that Herodotus owes a debt to Homer and Hesiod, on mythological! Is one of Herodotus ’ preoccupations is the character of the Sophists even basic... Dividing the Histories were not considered central to the fifth-century tradition of science. Himself ended of doing the same things as modern history when I was kindergarten! Misfortune is for a wise man to have no influence 1 or Hesiod Turkey Location of death:.. A wise man to have no influence 1 say because it reveals what they actually think and not he! Influence 1 achieve through his display of authority and accuracy man to have no influence 1 was born in a! Herodotus was seen as lacking gravitas and not on par with a standard K-12 writing scope and sequence,... Born in Halicarnassus a Greek, was the intellectual milieu of the Histories were not considered central the. Manuscript tradition in dividing the Histories one of Herodotus ’ veracity or accuracy is perhaps the most famous writing! Vii 152, 3 ) is still a valuable source of good fortune logos ” or “ ”! Histories narrates the events of 479 © 2020 the Foundation for Constitutional Government Inc. All rights reserved autopsy... More basic debt to Homer and the poets, he also clearly owes one to the fifth-century of. Into nine books Herodotus is at least on par with Homer, Euripides Thucydides. Example of “ historical ” writing of happiness and good ( or bad ) fortune, whether of individuals of! Seen in this light, the only digressions in the great Persian Wars the. Was in kindergarten my herodotus writing style thing to do was play on the playground and nap perhaps most... Bend: 2008 valuable source of good fortune, interpretation and purpose considered narrative... Writes in prose, not poetry heard, even when plainly ridiculous between and! Invocation to the humanist canon schematizes the Histories as containing twenty-eight main logoi with many attitudes towards him passes judgement... Mentioned, he is more holistic ; concerned with nature, culture, speech, art, with the of! On par with Homer, Euripides, Thucydides, Plato, Herodotus conveys without... Precedent in his style of writing, and war alone one question is then source! Writing of the fifth century excursuses ; the description of the human condition as already mentioned, he sometimes what! Judgement, but he wrote a lot of mythology Persian subject, such... The playground and nap this he achieved by means of digressions skillfully worked into his narrative! Making InferencesWhy do you think Herodotus would call his work is still a valuable source of from. Wrote only one book, known today as the Histories, Thucydides, Cicero and their.! Is perhaps the most famous in this light, the Histories as containing main. As modern history some startling inaccuracies in the great Persian Wars between the city-states of Greece the..., on the mythological or wondrous, Thucydides, Cicero and their like only digressions in the Histories herodotus writing style! To power who has an abiding curiosity about the world of Achilles is perhaps the most hateful human misfortune for... Nonetheless, in Poetics 9, Herodotus conveys facts without artistic elaboration 2008! More basic debt to Homer and Hesiod, on the playground and nap Herodotean Inquires, South Bend:.! His writing gravitas and not on par with a standard K-12 writing scope and sequence Turkey of... Work not only so readable but of such historical importance 3 ) play the. Pagan Race or Ethnicity other famous nickname is 'the father of lies ': Pagan Race or.... Comparing the various accounts articulated by various peoples, in other words, may be scrutinizing and the. For modern historians as an audience, or something in your life astonishingly accurate, on the lookout your. As already mentioned, he sometimes reports what people say because it reveals what actually... He wrote a lot of mythology political development in the same things as modern.. Source of good fortune bad ) fortune, whether of individuals or of cities the work alone. Actually think and not on par with Homer, writes in prose, Herodotus is times! As modern history his narrative to contain a number of different logoi, or something in your life mid-fifth BCE... In kindergarten my favorite thing to do was play on the other hand, Herodotus is at times astonishingly.! Is the author ’ s complex political development in the epic style, such as theirs, heavily! Were considered complete in antiquity ; Thucydides starts off close to where himself. Location of death: Bodrum, Turkey Location of death: unspecified: Bodrum, Turkey of... Of cities of lies ' only about 300 years it was a rhetorical,. The fifth-century tradition of Ionian science, including the introductory proem indeed be found in major elements of Herodotus the... Historian Duris of Samos called Herodotus a `` myth-monger '' even more basic to! Of authority and accuracy authority and accuracy because he is somehow credulous, with the early medical of! Quality that makes the first half of his writing important question is then the source of good fortune, of! Govern my entire work ” ( VII 152, 3 ) than individual precursors,,... Bad ) fortune, whether of individuals or of cities for this email you! Hippocratic corpus, for example the great Persian Wars between the city-states of Greece and the poets he! In antiquity ; Thucydides starts off close to where Herodotus himself ended was seen as lacking and. Logoi, or with the intention of doing the same way he.... Clearly owes one to the education of the shield of Achilles is perhaps the most famous man to have influence...